MADANI logo - is this not an 'incomplete' flag? Should the PM also not be investigated? Will the police investigate the PM?

Should Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim also be investigated and/or charged for a flag offence, just have a look at the Madai Logo, which is also on billboards with Anwar's face? It is Anwar's government logo...It is the Malaysian flag 

PRIME MINISTER Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has stressed that the recent publication of an incomplete Malaysian flag by a Chinese-language newspaper is "not a trivial matter," underscoring the importance of national symbols 

So, if one looks at the MADANI logo, it is an incomplete Malaysian Flag. There is no 14 stripes - representing the 13 States and the Federal Territories. It has only 10 stripes, so are the some stripes left out because the some states are ruled by Opposition? The number of stripes is important.

Recently, there was an issue over a PAS logo -  incomplete points on the star of the Jalur Gemilang. If there is an issue with that, should there not be an issue with the MADANI logo - which certainly do not have the required 14 stripes..

Flag 'blunders' of late has become an issue - but there is NO specific law that deals with wrong potrayal of the Malaysian flag at the moment 

MCMC summons Chinese daily over incomplete Jalur Gemilang image -Kwong Wah Yit Poh has been summoned by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) over an alleged flag error on its official Facebook account. - NST, 16/4/2025 

Lembah Pantai MP Fahmi Fadzil revealed that five police reports have been filed over an incident where an exhibitor at an event in a Kuala Lumpur mall screened a video showing the Jalur Gemilang without the crescent moon. FMT, 20/4/2025 

NATIONAL EMBLEMS (CONTROL OF DISPLAY) ACT 1949 (REVISED 1977) does not have a specific offence about 'incomplete national flags' 

This Acts criminalizes display of national emblems, including flags - except on ships and planes. Sec 3(1) of the Act states that,  'No person shall display in public or at or within any school any national emblem.' The limited exemption in the Act includes accredited diplomats and 'any person in the service of a Commonwealth Government or the Government of any British dependency or possession or of the Republic of Ireland and officially recognized as representing that Government in Malaysia'.

Thus, the display of National Flags or State flags is an offence, and that will include the putting up of flags during Independence day(MERDEKA) and on other occasions is an offence. Likewise, car stickers, etc. Perusing the Act in a website, that will also list supplementary legislation and/or Orders by Minister, I saw there was no order that allowed the members of public to display the flags on specified occasions.  

EMBLEMS AND NAMES (PREVENTION OF IMPROPER USE) ACT 1963 (REVISED 1989)-where this act covers the Malaysian Flag(Jalur Gemilang) - but this Act is too strict, as any use requires written permission of Minister...

 3  Prohibition of improper use of emblems, names and pictorial representations

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, no person shall, except with the written permission of the Minister-

(a) use any specified name or specified emblem, or any colourable imitation thereof, for the purpose of any trade, business, calling or profession.

(b) use for the purposes of, or display as an advertisement for, any business, trade, calling or profession, or sell, any photograph, drawing or other pictorial representation of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Raja Permaisuri Agong;

(c) use or continue to use any specified name or specified emblem, or any colourable imitation thereof, in the title of any patent, or in any trade mark or design; or

(d) make for the purpose of sale or sell or have in his possession for sale, any specified emblem.

(2) Paragraph (1)(b) relating to the use of any photograph, drawing or other pictorial representation aforesaid shall not apply to the publication of news (whether in a newspaper or by any other medium) or to the publication of any article in a newspaper.,,,

This is absurd, if Malaysians cannot display the flag, or even place stickers, ...without the written approval of the Minister. We should be free to do so without any requirement of any Minister or Prime Minister... Intentionally using it for a evil purpose may be a crime - but would it not be against freedom of expression?

Thus, the first thing to do is make it a crime to display 'incomplete' national flags. Should it also apply to logos - can part of flag be used in adverts, etc? Well, Parliament will need to clarify.

Requiring the written approval of the Minister is absurd - so the law should specify when and where the flag can be displayed? Can it be on socks, T-shirts, etc

Since, the issue of 'incomplete' flag has become an issue, it is ODD because the 1st violators of this 'crime' in recent time might be the government itself - the MADANI Logo, which is found on billboards, ...

When the issue of the PAS's event logo was brought up - one cannot ignore the MADANI Logo...

Now, students in Malaysian schools are expected to wear Malaysian flag badges - has the Minister given the written approval? Can flags be thrown away in dustbins, can it be dirty? Much to think about when it comes to laws on flags....? 

"In any nation, the national flag is an extremely important symbol. My advice is for everyone to be careful," he[PRIME MINISTER Anwar Ibrahim] said.

So, why did he approve the MADANI Logo - that displays an incomplete flag - not enough stripes? 

Will the government apologize - or are we living in a country where whatever the Pm and/or government does is always right, irrespective as to whether it is legal or not?

 

 

Anwar: Publishing incomplete national flag ‘not a trivial matter’, but urges calm amid legal process

Prime Minister calls for care, due process following backlash over incomplete Jalur Gemilang image in a local Chinese newspaper

Updated 1 month ago · Published on 18 Apr 2025 2:53PM

"In any nation, the national flag is an extremely important symbol. My advice is for everyone to be careful," PM says - April 18, 2025

PRIME MINISTER Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has stressed that the recent publication of an incomplete Malaysian flag by a Chinese-language newspaper is "not a trivial matter," underscoring the importance of national symbols while calling for restraint and adherence to due process.

Speaking to Malaysian media at the conclusion of his official visit to Bangkok, Anwar said all parties must treat the national flag with the respect it deserves.

"In any nation, the national flag is an extremely important symbol. My advice is for everyone to be careful," he said.

The controversy erupted earlier this week when Sin Chew Daily printed a front-page illustration of the Jalur Gemilang that was missing the crescent moon, prompting widespread criticism.

While the publication has since apologised and attributed the incident to an unintentional technical error, public and official scrutiny remains high.

Anwar acknowledged the newspaper’s response but cautioned against inflaming tensions.

"Let’s give room to Sin Chew Daily to explain its mistake and apologise. Nevertheless, this is not a trivial matter. Let the process of law run its course," he said.

Calling for measured responses, the prime minister urged the public not to escalate the matter unnecessarily.

"I would also like to ask that we do not go overboard. There is a legal process that must be followed," he added.

Police questioned 42 people

The incident is currently under police investigation, with 42 individuals, including the editor-in-chief of Sin Chew Daily, having been questioned. Authorities have invoked the Emblems and Names Act 1963 and the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 in the ongoing probe.

Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Datuk Seri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay, confirmed that the investigation into the matter is ongoing.

"At this point, the investigation is still underway. We have questioned 42 witnesses, and we may call more individuals for questioning," he said in a press conference after the opening of the Country Homes Police Station in Selangor on Friday, which was officiated by the Crown Prince of Selangor, Tengku Amir Shah.

The case is being investigated under Section 3(1)(c) of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1963, as well as Section 4(1)(b) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.

Earlier, the Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Razarudin, confirmed that the editor-in-chief and deputy editor of the Chinese-language newspaper were briefly detained to assist with the investigation, but both were released later that evening.

The controversy arose on Tuesday when the newspaper featured an illustration of the Malaysian flag on its front page in relation to the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Malaysia. However, the flag was shown without the crescent moon, which led to widespread criticism, including from the King of Malaysia, Sultan Ibrahim.

The Sultan advised that newspaper management and editorial teams should be more vigilant and review materials thoroughly before publication.

In response, the newspaper issued an apology, explaining that the incident was due to an unintentional technical error. – April 18, 2025, Vibes

Terengganu Pas apologises for Jalur Gemilang logo blunder

By Fuad Nizam - May 12, 2025 @ 9:16pm

The revised logo shared in a Facebook post on the Pas Terengganu page - PIC TAKEN FROM FB

KUALA LUMPUR: Terengganu Pas has issued a public apology over a controversial teaser logo for the Teguh Memimpin Terengganu (TMT) 2025 Gathering, which featured incomplete points on the star of the Jalur Gemilang.

The event's secretariat said it had retracted the logo and released an updated version.

"We would like to offer an open apology to the public and supporters for the unintentional mistake, and have taken immediate action to withdraw the use of the logo.

"The corrected version of the TMT 2025 logo has since been released and will be used in all future promotional materials and official announcements," it said in a statement.

Late last week, Pas began circulating posters promoting the Teguh Memimpin Terengganu Gathering, scheduled to take place in Kemaman from May 29 to 31.

The logo featured the Jalur Gemilang on the left, the Pas logo in the centre, and the Terengganu flag on the right.

However, the logo was criticised for depicting only an 11-pointed yellow star and 12 alternating red and white stripes.

The Jalur Gemilang should consist of 14 points and 14 stripes, representing the 13 states of the Malaysian Federation and the Federal Territories. - NST, 12/5/2025

“Stop normalising apologies as a fix for issues” – Dr Akmal Responds to Jalur Gemilang Error by PAS

May 13, 2025

By

Azri Azizan

Source: Facebook | Akmal Saleh & Facebook | Dr. Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar

ShareTweet

Another Jalur Gemilang blunder just happened, and this time, all eyes are on the Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) in Terengganu.

UMNO Youth Chief, Dr Akmal Saleh, continues to highlight the need for stricter actions against those who are still unable to recognise the Malaysian flag. In his Facebook post this morning (May 13), Akmal said it’s high time we stop normalising resolving issues with a mere apology.

Source: Facebook | Akmal Saleh

“If we could ask for stricter actions against the editorial team of the Chinese newspaper outlet and the officers in the Ministry of Education for a similar issue, we must also do the same for those involved this time.”

Akmal also highlighted that laws revolving around the abuse of the Malaysian flag should be made immediately so that stricter actions can serve as a stern reminder and a lesson to the offenders.

“It shouldn’t be resolved with a one-time apology.”

PAS cited an unintentional technical error in the incomplete Jalur Gemilang

On its “Himpunan Teguh Memimpin Terengganu (TMT) 2025” event teaser poster, PAS Terengganu overlooked the lack of the number of points in the star on the Malaysian flag.

Source: Facebook | Dr Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar

Source: Facebook | Dr Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar

The design of the poster showed only 11 points on the Federal Star when it should have 14 points. The logo also features 12 red-and-white stripes instead of 14. PAS immediately apologised and included an updated and accurate version of the Malaysian flag.

Do you think a stricter punishment should be considered for Malaysian flag errors? - World of Buzz

 

Urban Renewal - To rid UGLY Buildings or People? Local Government should be responsible for common areas/facilities in flats/apartments/condos? Lifespan of buildings - 30 years?

In Tamans or housing area, the owner/residents are only responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of their own homes, not the common areas shared/used by all other residents/persons like roads, drains beside roads, signboards, road bumps - it is the responsibility of the Local Government(Local Council) who ensures that the upkeep/maintenance of all these common areas - including grass cutting.

Thus, when it comes to apartments/flats/condominium - there is no reasonable justification as to why individual units/home residents must be be burdened 'collectively' with the maintenance or up keep of the common areas - like the corridors in front their homes, stair cases and even elevators(lifts) - it should be the Local Government/Local Council that must be responsible. This is ONLY Fair and JUST. 

Now, in many flats, apartments and condominiums, the responsibility of cleanliness and maintenance is passed on to a Management Committee of the owners - but the problem lies with the fact, that most owners/occupants do not pay their 'fees' - and this a problem. Further, some maintenance like lifts or having to change new lifts are very expensive for some of the high rise units. That is why, the maintenance of all common areas, including elevators, should be on the Local Government(Local Council) just like in Tamans. After all, everyone pays annually housing rates/tax to the Local Council. If this was the law, then we will not have the problem of elevators, cleanliness of the common areas, etc 

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim today reiterated that the government’s move to introduce an Urban Renewal Act is rooted in the need to provide better living conditions for Malaysians long trapped in dilapidated housing....“There are people living in public housing (PPR) flats that are over 50 years old, in overcrowded, uncomfortable conditions, plagued by serious social and disciplinary issues, all due to prolonged pressure and neglect.Malaysiakini, 25/4/2025

But are you improving the living conditions of the current owners/residents of the existing building > or simply bothered about bettering living conditions for a totally new group of owners/residents who have the ability of paying higher for better homes? 

Those now living in poor living conditions looks like they will be compensated for their current homes, and asked to GO. 

So, PM Anwar Ibrahim - is it about bettering living conditions of those currently living in 'dilapidated' housing or some other NEW owners of 'redeveloped' buildings? This is not right....

URBAN RENEWAL ACT - If the original owners are given a new unit after their building was demolished and rebuilt or renewed with no additional payment, then there will lesser objection. In the interim, whilst waiting for the redevelopment, the owner/occupier is given temporary housing, in the same area not to affect their lives and relationship with the people in the area. Their children can go to the same school, the distance to work(hence, the travel expense, remains the same, then there will be LESSER RESISTANCE.

The problem now, is that the original owners may just receive adequate compensation for the homes and expected to leave and live elsewhere.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim explained that, on the contrary, the proposed URA will protect the rights of property owners by ensuring fair and significantly higher compensation than is currently provided.....Regarding the concerns about how the original owners would be able to repurchase their renovated homes, Anwar emphasised that one of the key principles of the URA is that housing renewal projects must be carried out through consultation with the owners, ensuring their consent to participate in the project. - Malay Mail, 19/5/2025

So, what it means, is that the current owners will be given COMPENSATION for their current units/homes, and then it will belong to developer...After the development, ability to RE-PURCHASE but at what price and can the old owners even be able to afford it? It should house for house, with no extra payment to be just. ALTERNATIVELY, URA is a evil tool to get rid of particular people(poor/marginalized/lower class/unemployed or already retired or with no more income generating capacity) and we will have a new breed of 'BETTER' owners/residents?

URA is good news for everyone else, but not the owners/residents affected now > because it will beautify the area, and possibly raise the property prices for those not affected in the area.

Will the monies received as compensation be adequate to even buy a new home - probably NOT, and this means, even with the compensation used to purchase new units, they still will have to apply and get new loans > and again be burdened with monthly loan payments for a long time. [Remember, we are talking about units that are 30 years old or more.]

SO, again,  is the intention of the URA to get rid the POOR or what some considers 'lower class', irrespective of religion, ethnicity or nationalities - so that new buildings be built which will house a better quality of people as owners/residents? It is not a Malay/Bumiputra issue at all - but at risk are the poor and marginalized, or the people possibly 'Anwar and government' do not like living in the area. This is NOT Right.

Currently the law requires 100% approval of owners - before a flat/apartment building can be re-developed, and that I believe is fair and just. That requirement also means they who hold out may get HIGHER better compensation or deals (even a replacement unit in the newly developed building??)

Now, the proposed law says where the building is 30 years, they want the CHANGE the required consent to just 80% (so, it proceeds even if the remaining 20% says NO) - so, herein lies a main issue. When it comes to HOMES, most Malaysians places great value - it could have been their 1st home, the place their children were born and lived their entire life, the place where they hold on to memories of their loved ones - so, it is more than money. Then, it is also where their friends live and their community life is... so, in my opinion, the consent threshold should be 100%, unless there is a GUARANTEE of home for home, meaning they get back their 'improved' homes without the need for any extra payment - plus maybe alternate temporary housing nearby while development is happening. Would you want to abandon your home simply because 80% of other residents agreed to?

(2) The consent threshold for participation is as follows:
(a) where the age of buiding is thirty years, the consent threshold for participation shall be eighty percent;
(b) where the age of building is more than thirty years, the consent threshold for particaption shall be seventy-five percent;
(c) where an engineer has issued a certificate under paragraph 3(3)(b), the consent threshold for particaption shall be fifty-one percent; and
(d) where a building is abandoned, the consent threshold for particaption shall be fifty-one percent

Now, wait - it is not just urban redevelopment that the Act is talking about > it is also talking about 'urban regeneration' and 'urban revitalization' and I am not sure what it really means. It could mean housing units may be replaced by commercial units?

“urban redevelopment” means development made to change the physical condition of the existing sites which includes demolishment, clearing of the sites, erecting buildings, and upgrading infrastructure and utility facilities;

“urban regeneration” means development made in building areas which are neglected, dilapidated or abandoned by the process of repairing the existing building or upgrading the infrastructure or utility facilities and landscaping;

“urban revitalisation” includes development made to improve the said area or building by the process of upgrading, beautification or landscaping, including changing the activities suitable to the standard and function of that area or building.

Well, those involved in construction industry, financial institutions, etc are HAPPY because they will make money and business. Those living around the URA affected building are happy, as this may increase the value of their property...

30 Years - Does this mean that government approved the building of these houses/flats/apartments/condominiums to just last 30 years - when Malaysians bought these premises, their legitimate expectations was that it would last 100 years or more - something they can hand down to their children and grandchildren. But now the proposed URA Act is saying that life-span of these homes is just 30 years, just like cars? Why were the house-buyers never informed that they were just buying homes that last only 30 years.....??? I take out a 30 year loan to buy my house, and as soon as finally settle my loan, and it becomes 100% my house - it is of no value because it was just meant to last 30 years, and may be subject to URA?

If this be the case, it the Government's fault - as it approves all building plans, including the quality of material used. Housing/Buildings should be built to last 100 years or more --- some of the buildings built in the colonial era is still standing strong....[I have heard stories from contractors that build roads just before elections, that they were told that the roads only needed to last 6-12 months, but for homes/buildings this should not be the case to last just 30 plus years - was this a pre-GE14 BN regime's fault? 

When MP Syerleena spoke, was she even concerned about the current owners/residents? 

THE Urban Renewal Act (URA) will ensure all ordinary Malaysians have access to safe, decent, and liveable homes, said Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid.“For too long, our urban centres — once proud symbols of growth and diversity — have been allowed to crumble under the weight of neglect, outdated infrastructure, and poor planning.“If we continue to ignore this, many of our neighbourhoods will slip further into decay, dragging down the quality of life for millions,” she said in a statement.

But was it not the government itself that approved these now considered UNSAFE, UNLIVABLE and indecent homes in the first place?

Everyone is worried now - tell us how long our house/buildings are supposed to LAST based on the current construction standards. People need to know that it can last only 30 years, 50 years or more than 100 years? People need to know that it can withstand floods, and even earthquakes.

Should we INCREASE the Civil Limitation Period be increased to 50 years for owners to take action against Developers/Builders and even government authorities that approve building plans, and ensured that buildings were built according to standards to maybe last 100 years > now the limitation period for action against government is just 3 years, and for others, it is 6 years. So, maybe a special NEW Limitation Period for houses/buildings should be considered.

As proposed earlier, the owners/residents should be ONLY responsible for the cleanliness/maintenance of the own apartment/flat/condominium units  - the LOcal Government(Local Council) should be responsible for all common areas and common facilities - corridors, staircases, elevators, etc - same as those living in Tamans and housing estates.

URA should not be buying or compensating for units > existing owners should be given HOME for HOME in the new re-developed premises, without paying any additional monies, and during construction be provided temporary housing for free in the same area. This would be FAIR and just...as URA projects will be good for the entire town/state as well.

So, PM Anwar and his Ministers should not be talking about 'HIGHER' compensation, and the Right to RE-PURCHASE when the development is done...

The Government or the Local Government(Local Council) should be responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of all common areas, including corridors, lifts, etc...The government should also be responsible for the painting and upkeep of external walls - so that these building look decent, clean, etc.

Government should now look and see whether MAINTENANCE only is sufficient, and, if not, tell us WHY it needs to be DEMOLISHED and rebuilt? Was it a government failure in not ensuring proper plans, building materials and standards???

Let URA be another form of EVICTION to change the kind of people living in the area?

Let URA not be a tool to change the demography of the electors in the Constituency to simply improve chances of government parties winning future elections...

The URA Bill is yet to be tabled - so still time to right the wrongs in the proposed Bill? 

Old age, retirees and those without regular source of income > they simply will not be able to pay any additional monies or buy new homes.

Besides owners, the other group are the existing tenants - who may now be paying affordable rent - if they lose their tenancy, will they be able the afford the HIGHER rents in other places... There is no mention, I believe, about compensating or finding new premises for these tenants..

Anwar set the MINIMUM WAGE at RM1,700 - how much goes for rental? As it is a simple meal cost RM10 at least, and for 3 meals a day per month, he/she spends about RM900 - where is the money for the family/children, etc?

 

 

 

MP: Urban renewal is not a threat, but the help our cities desperately need

The Act proposes proper legal frameworks, transparent compensation, public consultation, and a people-first approach to redevelopment.

Updated 1 week ago · Published on 05 May 2025 2:24PM

Syerleena said some quarters in the opposition were using race to stoke fear - May 5, 2025

 

THE Urban Renewal Act (URA) will ensure all ordinary Malaysians have access to safe, decent, and liveable homes, said Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid.

 

“For too long, our urban centres — once proud symbols of growth and diversity — have been allowed to crumble under the weight of neglect, outdated infrastructure, and poor planning.

“If we continue to ignore this, many of our neighbourhoods will slip further into decay, dragging down the quality of life for millions,” she said in a statement.

She explained that the Act proposes proper legal frameworks, transparent compensation, public consultation, and a people-first approach to redevelopment.

“It moves us away from an era of shady backdoor deals and unchecked development — and toward a system that’s fair, transparent, and sustainable,” she said.

However, she said instead of working together to fix what’s broken, some quarters in the opposition were using race to stoke fear.

She said this brand of politics is not only reckless but it does nothing to address the real struggles faced by everyday Malaysians.

 “Just last week, Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming invited opposition MPs to visit run-down flats in the Klang Valley to see for themselves the urgency of urban renewal.

“Not one showed up. Instead of showing leadership, they stayed silent — content to criticise from afar,” she said.

She said the problems continue to mount. “In places like Rifle Range in Penang — once a pioneering model of public housing — the buildings are now falling apart. “Residents face outdated wiring, pest infestations, poor ventilation, and lifts that break down regularly.

“Many have asked for help for years, but efforts have been stalled by bureaucracy and the absence of a national legal mechanism,”.

 Syerleena said Penang has tried to act on its own, but without federal support, even the best intentions get tangled in red tape. “The URA can change that — giving states the power and resources to act decisively, while ensuring that no community is left behind,” she added.

 She stressed that Malay rights are protected under our Federal Constitution — and Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has reiterated this fact time and again.

 “The URA is a tool for progress that upholds fairness and presents hope and about making sure our children grow up with access to parks and clean walkways, not rat-infested corridors.

“While making sure our seniors live in comfort and not in fear of building collapse,” she said.

Rifle Range, like so many communities across the country, is multiracial. Malays, Chinese, Indians — all struggling with the same issues: failing infrastructure, unsafe buildings, and a lack of basic services.

Supporting the URA means choosing a Malaysia that works for everyone — not just for those lucky enough to live behind security guards and gated fences, she added. – May 5, 2025, Vibes

Anwar: Urban Renewal Act will protect property owners, not displace Malays and Bumiputeras

The perception that the Urban Renewal Act (URA) will cause Malays and Bumiputeras to lose their place in the city, or that the law prioritises developers, is incorrect. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin

By Soo Wern Jun

Wednesday, 19 Mar 2025 2:20 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, March 19 — The perception that the Urban Renewal Act (URA) will cause Malays and Bumiputeras to lose their place in the city, or that the law prioritises developers, is incorrect.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim explained that, on the contrary, the proposed URA will protect the rights of property owners by ensuring fair and significantly higher compensation than is currently provided. 

This was shared by the Prime Minister’s senior press secretary, Tunku Nashrul Abaidah, during the Prime Minister’s Office daily briefing today.

Anwar also added that the law aims to protect the rights and dignity of the people, particularly Malays in the cities, ensuring that the urban poor can live with greater dignity, rather than being left to live in overcrowded conditions for decades without resolution.

Tunku Nashrul stated that “The Urban Renewal Bill is a solution to the struggle between the people and the developers that has been going on for a long time.”

The Prime Minister clarified that there are misconceptions about the original homeowners losing their rights once the law is implemented.

Regarding the concerns about how the original owners would be able to repurchase their renovated homes, Anwar emphasised that one of the key principles of the URA is that housing renewal projects must be carried out through consultation with the owners, ensuring their consent to participate in the project.

Once an agreement is reached, the owners will receive renovated properties, compensation, living allowances, and several other benefits during and after construction.

The Prime Minister further stressed that the URA will ensure that the renovated houses are returned to the original owners, allowing them to return to live on the original site once the development is complete.

He also stressed that the property compensation value the owner will receive will be based on the future market value, helping them to repurchase their renovated house. This is different from the current situation, where compensation decided by the consultant or the court is based on the current value.

Tunku Nashrul added, “In addition to compensation that is much higher than the current method, the URA will also ensure that various forms of compensation or benefits are provided to the owner, including transit housing rental payments, ex-gratia payments for renovation of existing properties, and other payments to support the owner’s livelihood during the construction period, as well as ensuring that any redevelopment emphasises the principles of social justice that are the basis of the Madani concept.”

The Housing and Local Government Ministry has identified up to 139 pieces of land in Kuala Lumpur for redevelopment, with 91 of them being residential properties. These projects are expected to generate an estimated gross development value of RM332.5 billion. - Malay Mail, 19/3/2025

FRU officers death - Was PM Anwar, Home Minister, IGP, Minister of Transport, Employer, etc responsible for the 9 deaths? Wrong to bring up past convictions of driver? Tunnel Vision?

Is PM Anwar Ibrahim, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail (Minister of Home Affairs of Malaysia who is responsible for the Police including FRU), the Inspector General of Police, the employer/owner of the lorry, the government department and/or officers(including Minister of Transport) - who is responsible to ensure road-worthiness of trucks, the employer/owner of the truck? Consider this...

 SHOCKING - Why did the police reveal that the driver of the lorry that was involved in the 'accident' with the FRU truck had several past convictions? This was wrong, the fact that he had past convictions is IRRELEVANT to this accident - and revealing it caused PREJUDICE against the driver and his family/friends. Is the police BIASED against the driver, noting that the other vehicle was a police/government vehicle?

Tunnel vision occurs when investigators become overly focused on a specific suspect or theory, ignoring other possible leads or interpretations of evidence. This narrow focus can lead to mistakes as officers fail to consider alternative suspects, motives, or evidence that could point in a different direction.

For example, once an investigator becomes convinced that a particular person committed the crime, they might subconsciously disregard or downplay any evidence that contradicts their theory. Over time, this narrowed focus can result in biased decisions, preventing the truth from surfacing.

Do not forget that our Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has at least 5 past conviction, 4 for corruption/abuse of power, and one for SODOMY. Will this matter when he is being investigated for a road accident, or any other crimes? NOPE - it is totally irrelevant.. and it can lead to 'tunnel vision' amongst the police/investigators if the allow past convictions to influence their investigation of suspects.

Those who are repentant of their crimes should be treated as ORDINARY citizens after they come out after serving their sentence > of course, some like even our current PM seem to have never acknowledge his crimes, let alone repented, as he still claims INNOCENCE... The employer should be applauded for giving employment to a former convict...as sometimes, convictions makes it rather difficult to get jobs - SECOND CHANCE denied wrongly.

Past CONVICTIONS or suspicion of past criminal activity should NEVER prejudice police investigations - or even trials.

The courts too does not take into consideration past crimes or convictions during the trial, and only after CONVICTION will the court look at past crimes, for the purpose of sentencing. The fact, that is a REPEAT offender may lead to a higher sentence. The fact that he/she had been convicted for other different crimes, different from the one he/she has been tried and convicted will reasonably not be taken into consideration.

He[Deputy Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay ] said the 45-year-old lorry driver had a criminal record of six previous cases, one for drugs, one for rape and four for theft. However, he said all these cases have already been tried in court and sentencing was passed down.

Deputy Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay acted unprofessionally, in my opinion, and  this also brought disrepute to the Malaysian Police - THUS, he should APOLOGIZE, and action should be taken against him.

Home Minister or IGP must address this problem - do not reveal to the public past convictions of suspects being investigated, including of victims of police shooting.

Police should focus on the accident or crime(if any) - and should not be prejudiced by the background of the suspect , be it his ethnicity, religion, poverty level, fact that he is not a YB or a YAB, or even the fact that he has past convictions for other unrelated crimes. 

As it is, a suspect already is subjected to bias, when the victims are public officers or persons of certain ethnicity/religion and alleged perpetrator was of a minority ethnic/religion. 

The police must at all times be PROFESSIONAL and unbiased in investigation of any crimes. They must never presume a suspect guilty - and focus the investigation on just getting evidence to support their presumption. They should be open to the possibility of other suspects, and evidence that the suspect may be not guilty.

Has the accident investigation even been completed? Who caused the accident? Was it the DRIVER of the truck, or was it the Employer who asked this man a poorly maintained truck? When was the last safety inspection - was the government authorities or its authorized vehicle inspectors involved - if yes, how come this defective lorry given the 'green light' to be used? Was there negligence on the part of the government that failed to ensure the road-worthiness of such vehicles? Was there corruption? Does not such vehicles require regular inspection to determine road worthiness - at least once a year?

Yesterday, Bakri said preliminary investigations suggested that a steering wheel failure was believed to have caused the accident. 

If there was 'steering wheel failure', then how can one even blame the employee DRIVER - the fault then would lie in the employer company and those responsible for 'road-worthiness' and safety of the vehicle. A driver is given the truck and asked to drive only - he is generally not responsible for the maintenance of the vehicle or the upkeep of the vehicle? So, why have been the name of the employer company or the owner of the truck been mentioned yet.

Why is the driver being remanded - do you think he will not turn up at the police station for the purpose of investigation? The same treatment accorded to Najib and other 'big shots' should be accorded to any ordinary person >> There is really NO NEED to detain suspects for the purposes of investigation - Beware, it may be 'per-conviction punishment', and let's not forget the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in court - Yes, it is not for the police or even the government to conclude that someone is GUILTY - it is for the Courts.

Next, we will focus on the FRU Truck itself - was it safe for its passengers? Was there seat-belts that will prevent death or injury? Whose responsibility was that PM, Home Minister...

Why do we have to wait for a Disaster, before the government acts? 

Petronas Gas Pipeline - Victims were assisted a bit > but where are the REFORMS? New Standards of Safety? The approval of houses/buildings so close to danger? The government approval to work with heavy machinery so close to the pipeline...?

Now, 9 are dead because there were no safety measures in the FRU truck to prevent injury and death? Again, some financial assistance - and trying to lay blame on the driver...Something is amiss.

PM Anwar's government will most probably 'move on' - and hope the public be satisfied with the driver of the truck being blamed for it - How unjust when the government does not take responsibility for mishaps and deaths that could have been avoided by good governance, good enforcement, ...

Lorry driver with six past convictions remanded over Teluk Intan crash that killed nine FRU officers

The lorry driver transporting a load of gravel who was involved in the accident that claimed the lives of nine Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) personnel has been remanded for four days starting today. — Bernama pic

By Malay Mail

Wednesday, 14 May 2025 11:03 AM MYT

TELUK INTAN, May 14 – The driver of the lorry involved in a crash that killed nine Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) policemen on Jalan Sungai Manik-Sungai Lampam has been remanded for four days, New Straits Times reported.

The remand order, issued under Section 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code, was granted by Magistrate Naidatul Athirah Azman following an application by Hilir Perak police chief Assistant Commissioner Bakri Zainal Abidin

The order is effective from today until Saturday as investigations proceed under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 for reckless driving causing death.

The 45-year-old suspect appeared in court around 8.50am wearing a black shirt and dark blue tracksuit.

Yesterday, Deputy Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay clarified there was no ketum found in the lorry that crashed into the FRU vehicle and the driver’s urine was negative for drugs.

He said the 45-year-old lorry driver had a criminal record of six previous cases, one for drugs, one for rape and four for theft.

However, he said all these cases have already been tried in court and sentencing was passed down.

Earlier this morning, the final honours for nine personnel were completed in accordance with Royal Malaysia Police ceremonial protocols at the FRU Unit 5 base in Sungai Senam in Ipoh.

Nine members of the FRU were killed, while two others sustained injuries, when a lorry carrying stones collided with an FRU truck transporting 15 personnel yesterday.

Yesterday, Bakri said preliminary investigations suggested that a steering wheel failure was believed to have caused the accident. - Malay Mail, 14/5/2025

 

FRU crash: PDRM identifies safety upgrades for personnel transport after fatal accident

---

• Nation

• Wednesday, 14 May 2025

  8:22 PM MYT

Photo: Bernama

KUALA LUMPUR: The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) has identified safety enhancement measures for its personnel travelling in trucks for operations, following the crash that claimed the lives of nine Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) personnel on Tuesday (May 13).

Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain said a discussion would be held with the leadership of the Internal Security and Public Order department, as the department also used trucks to transport General Operations Force (GOF) personnel.

"Among the aspects under review is the addition of a better system to protect passengers in the trucks, although these trucks have long benches that may or may not be compatible with the system," he said when contacted on Wednesday (May 14).

He said another measure being considered was the use of buses and police patrol cars to escort the force's vehicle convoys.

In the 8.50am incident on Tuesday, nine personnel from FRU Unit 5 based in Sungai Senam, Ipoh, were killed after the truck they were travelling in collided with a lorry. – Bernama, Star, 14/5/2025

Azam Baki remains as MACC Chief (3rd 1 year contract) - and it is 'NOT RIGHT' - PM should not select or remove, Security of Tenure needed for all heads of law enforcement? PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT?

Azam Baki, according to Wikipedia. is 62 years old(born on 12/5/1963), and as a public officer ought to have retired when he reached the current retirement age of 60. 

Surely, Malaysia has other persons, in MACC or otherwise, who could have been appointed as the MACC Chief...

So, the question were must ponder is WHY Anwar Ibrahim gave him another short-term(1 year) contract? Some employers resort to short-term or 1 year employment contracts - to subdue employees from demanding or claiming rights (causing 'trouble') for such precarious employees generally will be 'loyal' and fearful of offending employer, for fear that their contract will not be renewed or extended. So, did PM Anwar also give 3 one-year extensions for the same purpose? Did it make Azam Baki do what Anwar wanted? The current system must be REFORMED to appointment until retirement age, with no further extensions for Malaysia surely has many others capable of leading the MACC.

Azam’s new term will run from May 13, 2025 to May 12, 2026. The 62-year-old has held the position since March 9, 2020, succeeding Latheefa Koya, with previous one-year reappointments in May 2023 and May 2024. - .- Malay Mail, 12/5/2025

Before, we move on to other matters - The head of any law enforcement body, be it the police, MACC or some other, it is important that they BE INDEPENDENT and carry out their duty as per law. - including if it involves the PM?

SECURITY OF TENURE is a must, in that they should be secured in their position, and should not be easily removed or replaced by the Prime Minister or the government of the day. The only reason for removal should be a serious breach of duty or serious misconduct.

So, anyone appointed to be the head of MACC, or law enforcement body should have a Security of Tenure - until they reach retirement age, which is now 60.

Thereafter, he should best not be re-appointed - and, if post-retirement re-appointment is allowed, it must be definite and stated in law - 6 months or 1 year...

Why? The PM's ability to extend employment beyond retirement age, and the power to simply end services as he pleases is OPEN to ABUSE. 

It's a power that  can be used to 'CONTROL' the MACC Chief - 'do as PM 'instructs' or wants, and your service will be extended - if not, no extension or even early termination. Remember, the MACC Chief now '...hold office at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, subject to the advice of the Prime Minister...' 

This, in reality, means PM can appoint (or extend tenure), or REMOVE AS HE PLEASES. 

The law does not state clearly the requirement of reasons for dismissal - like serious misconduct, breach of duty, breach of Code of Ethics, etc.. There is no mention of a need of any procedure for removal - like a 'domestic inquiry' or a Tribunal of some sort like is provided for removal pf Judges.

Art 125 (3) If the Prime Minister, or the Chief Justice after consulting the Prime Minister, represents to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong that a judge of the Federal Court ought to be removed on the ground of any breach of any provision of the code of ethics prescribed under Clause (3B) or on the ground of inability, from infirmity of body or mind or any other cause, properly to discharge the functions of his office, the Yang di- Pertuan Agong shall appoint a tribunal in accordance with Clause (4) and refer the representation to it; and may on the recommendation of the tribunal remove the judge from office.

2nd issue - Who chooses the head of MACC? It is the Prime Minister, noting that the King can only appoint as advised by the Prime Minister. 

Section 5  Chief Commissioner [MALAYSIAN ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT 2009]

(1) The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall, on the advice of the Prime Minister, appoint a Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission for such period and on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the instrument of appointment.

(2) Where the Chief Commissioner is appointed from among members of the public services, the period of appointment of the chief commissioner shall not extend beyond the date of his compulsory retirement from the public service, but where he so attains the age of compulsory retirement he may be reappointed as chief commissioner by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, on the advice of the Prime Minister, on contract for such period and on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the instrument of appointment.

(3) The Chief Commissioner shall, during the period of his appointment as set out in the instrument of appointment, hold office at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, subject to the advice of the Prime Minister.

(4) The Chief Commissioner shall, during his term of office as such, be deemed to be a member of the general public service of the Federation for purposes of discipline....

 

After Najib, we now know that even Prime Minister, whilst in office, can commit crimes of corruption, etc. PM No. 8 Muhyiddin Yasin already charged, PM No.9 Ismail Sabri being investigated now for corruption.

Malaysia’s former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin was charged with four counts of abuse of power involving RM232.5 million (S$70 million) in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court on Friday over projects awarded under his government’s stimulus programme. - The Straits Times, 22/11/2024 

Why did the MACC not investigate when they were Prime Minister? Could the MACC not investigate because the Prime Minister has 'too much power', and that the PM could without any reason remove any MACC Chief anytime? - so, is the PM's power to appoint, and remove any MACC Chief as he pleases is a Problem -  '...hold office at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, subject to the advice of the Prime Minister...'

Why did the MACC take so much time investigating matters raised by Zahid Hamidi - that delay ultimately led to Zahid getting a DNAA in September 2023, and Azam Baki was the MACC Chief then? Zahid Hamidi's DNAA - One reason was MACC needed more time to investigate? Why, after 9 months, MACC not completed additional investigation?

Is this 'excessive power' in the hands of the PM a problem - how come we have not heard of any new investigations by MACC on Anwar Ibrahim, his Ministers and his friends? 

Maybe, no crimes OR maybe MACC and its chief are too 'afraid' or have been 'compromised?...

THUS, Section 5 need to amended to state that the appointment is until age of retirement of a public officer, and delete that vague provision 'for such period and on such terms and conditions'. It should be appointment until RETIREMENT AGE, and can be removed earlier by a difficult process. 

Section 5(3) should be deleted, because it means the Chief Commissioner can be removed at any time up to the Prime Minister  'at the pleasure of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, subject to the advice of the Prime Minister'

So, if Azam Baki(or any other Chief Commissioner) actively starts investigating Anwar Ibrahim himself, or his friends, now Anwar can so easily remove him. This possibility best be dealt with now

If Azam Baki or any other Chief Commissioner does 'not listen' and do as the PM wants - then the PM can again remove and replace him.

 NEEDED REFORMS

1- The Prime Minister power to appoint and/or remove MACC Chiefs, or any other Law enforcement heads must be removed NOW, and the choosing and the appointment of Law Enforcement heads, including MACC must be done by an INDEPENDENT BODY, who will directly advice the King.

Alternatively - The Prime Minister can propose names, but no appointment until Parliament has approved, possibly with the public having the opportunity to provide input. VETTING or Parliamentary approval.. Malaysia should maybe enact a law, as in Kenya's PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT

2. Law Enforcement only has a duty to the public and the law. They enforce the law independently and professionally, and is not BIASED in favour of government of the day, or act on the wishes/instructions of the PM/Government of the Day. In Malaysia, it has already proven that Prime Ministers and Ministers, whilst in power, do commit crimes of abuse of power and corruption. I wonder, if MACC or law enforcement had acted faster against Najib, how much of 1MDB or Malaysian money could have been saved.

Thus, to ensure INDEPENDENCE, and no possibility of being compromised, SECURITY OF TENURE is needed, employment until RETIREMENT AGE only, and no extensions. Removal of such persons must also be difficult, and need to be done by some Tribunal/Court, independent of the Prime Minister or government of the day.

One wonders whether when the next government comes into power, we will see current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, Ministers, etc all getting investigated, and charged for crimes. The trend of Ministers using power to to commit crimes like corruption, abuse of power, money laundering, etc - Examples include Anwar Ibrahim himself, then Najib - and others who though not yet convicted include the Deputy Prime Minister Zahid Hamidi, etc 

HENCE, reliance on the current practice, where the Prime Minister and/or Ministers advice the King to appoint persons who head law enforcement, Public Prosecutor and even JUDGES does not work anymore, and must be changed. 

We need to FREE law enforcement, prosecution and judges from the powers of the Prime Minister in terms of appointment and/or removal > or any other form of 'CONTROL". Those involved in the Administration of Justice must be INDEPENDENT and professional, free from whatever influence or interference from the PM, Ministers, Government, Political Parties in Government, etc... 

AZAM BAKI was a 'controversial figure' - there were allegation that he had 'too much' shares in companies - In my opinion, those in law enforcement should have no shares in any company - for if they do, they might not take needed actions and investigations on such companies (or related companies) fearing that it might cause a DROP in share value.. this will compromise law enforcement?

In response, Azam Baki allegedly said that the shares were his brother's, and he had let his brother use his share trading account. Interestingly, the Securities Commission said no crime > would that mean that now anyone can use anyone's share trading account to trade in shares?

Then, there was the question as to whether Azam Baki made the needed declaration of increased assets, as it was a requirement of all Public Officers.

When Terence Gomez, a member of a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission panel, tried to bring up matters about Azam Baki, etc - the Chairman of the Commission refused to convene the Commission - at the end of the day, Terence Gomez resigned in protest [That incident also highlighted the failings of check and balance mechanisms to ensure MACC functions correctly. Appointing members to the Commission is useless, if it is all 'seat-warmers' not willing to do the duties such check and balance mechanisms are meant to do}  

We recall that Azam Baki, sued journalist Lalitha Kunaratnam, a whistleblower, that highlighted to the public alleged wrongdoings of Azam Baki - including about the shares.. 

Anwar Ibrahim was very wrong giving Azam Baki an extension, then a second extension and now the 3rd extension. Do not blame the King, for the King has NO CHOICE but to do as advised by PM Anwar Ibrahim..

 

We need those who are indisputably CLEAN, EFFICIENT and TRUSTWORTHY, and so only those who fit that BILL ought to be appointed as heads of Law Enforcement - we need people who are brave enough to investigate and prosecute PM Anwar if he broke the law... 

The government will examine the implications of a proposal to place the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) under the jurisdiction of Parliament, said Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. - Star, 18/6/2024

PM Anwar Ibrahim is good on making promises or verbal commitments - and then, we see nothing happening..

 

MACC is also implicated in the Pamela Ling's disappearance. Disappeared after she commenced action against MACC?

Pamela Ling - Another case of Enforced Dissapearance? - Interesting Media Statement by Caged, Why is the Government doing this?

 
 

See also earlier posts(there are more - just search in the site):- 

MACC should be under Parliament, and no more under the Prime Minister ## A simple amendment requiring prior Parliament’s approval....

Hiding identity using others' share trading account, bank account? The Azam Baki case raises concerns

Malaysian Anti-Corruption 'problems', 5 check and blance mechanisms, silence of the Parliamentarians' Special Committee on Corruption? 

Azam Baki (innocent until proven guilty) but suitability to remain MACC chief??? Terence (MACC Panel member) 'quits'

 

Azam Baki says royal assent for MACC reappointment an honour, vows to improve country’s image amid public discontent

Chief Commissioner of the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission, Tan Sri Azam Baki, was reappointed with a new term that runs until May next year. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

By Malay Mail

Monday, 12 May 2025 4:50 PM MYT

PUTRAJAYA, May 12 – Tan Sri Azam Baki has today extended his gratitude to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim for consenting to his reappointment as Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner for another year.

In a statement, Azam described the royal assent as an honour for both him and the commission.

“Fully aware of the duties and trust placed upon me, I will continue to lead MACC’s efforts to eradicate all forms of corruption, abuse of power and misconduct in order to build a prosperous, just and harmonious nation,” he said.

He also thanked Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for the latter’s trust and continued support.

He said the commission remained committed to improving Malaysia’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) score and enhancing the country’s reputation internationally.

Azam’s new term will run from May 13, 2025 to May 12, 2026

The 62-year-old has held the position since March 9, 2020, succeeding Latheefa Koya, with previous one-year reappointments in May 2023 and May 2024.

His reappointment has since been met with criticism from some in the civil society, including from Anwar’s daughter Nurul Izzah who said the extension was “unwelcome”.- Malay Mail, 12/5/2025

 

Terence Gomez quits MACC panel in protest over shares issue

Terence Gomez quits MACC panel in protest over shares issue

3 years ago

FMT Reporters

He says he had written three times to ask the panel to discuss allegations involving MACC chief Azam Baki and a former chief.

Economist Edmund Terence Gomez said he has resigned from an MACC advisory panel.

PETALING JAYA:

Economist Edmund Terence Gomez has resigned as a member of a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission panel after it failed to discuss reports implicating the top leaders at the anti-graft agency.

In his resignation letter, Gomez said disturbing questions had been raised about the “nexus between business and law enforcement” and a “conflict of interest” situation involving MACC Chief Commissioner Azam Baki and his alleged extensive ownership of corporate stock.

Gomez also said a former MACC Chief Commissioner was allegedly involved in a conflict-of-interest situation, “suggesting a trend in this institution that must be investigated promptly”

Gomez said he had written thrice to MACC’s Consultation and Corruption Prevention Panel chairman Borhan Dollah, to push the panel to discuss the matter. FMT is seeking a response from Borhan.

He had also written to the MACC Anti-Corruption Advisory Board chairman Abu Zahar Nika Ujang on three occasions, proposing that Abu Zahar raise the matter in the advisory board “only to find that Abu Zahar too did not respond to my request, to my disappointment”.

When contacted this evening, Gomez said he had sent in his resignation earlier today to Borhan.

Copies had been made available to the press for fear that, otherwise, the consultation panel chairman and the chairman of the anti-corruption advisory board would not act on the allegations facing Azam, whom he said he had named in his letter to safeguard the integrity of the anti-graft agency.

Gomez said he was first made aware of the allegations against Azam in articles published at a website and wrote two letters to Burhan about the articles.

“I stressed that the information that I had received was deeply troubling as it was based on extensive research. The author of these news reports had also listed her name, indicating she was available to discuss this matter with the panel,” Gomez said.

He said he was extremely disappointed that the advisory board had not met to discuss the matter, even after it was brought up in Parliament on Dec 14 and widely reported in the media.

He said Azam had yet to issue any public statement nor had he responded to statements by MPs on his business dealings.

Gomez told FMT that he is currently pushing for the panel’s response. “The letter was sent to the press to publicise this reluctance to act on an important issue. The press has to help us keep this matter in the public eye until an independent investigation is done. The prime minister should also act on this matter to protect the integrity of the MACC,” he said.

Allegations about a top MACC official were raised in the Dewan Rakyat on Dec 14 by a group of MPs from PKR, led by Sungai Buloh MP Sivarasa Rasiah. He called on the authorities to investigate the official, saying the investigation must be independent and should not be carried out by the MACC.

Gomez was appointed to the panel for a two-year term from June 1, 2020 to May 31 next year. - FMT, 27/12/2021

MACC chief’s libel suit against journalist to be heard in July next year

MACC chief’s libel suit against journalist to be heard in July next year

2 years ago

FMT Reporters

Azam Baki claims a two-part series on him and his purchase of shares were sensational, scandalous and offensive.

MACC chief Azam Baki is suing journalist Lalitha Kunaratnam for defamation over two articles published in 2021.

KUALA LUMPUR:

A defamation suit filed by the country’s top graft buster, Azam Baki, against journalist Lalitha Kunaratnam has been fixed for trial over four days beginning July 9 next year.

Azam’s lawyer, Shahir Tahir, said the dates were fixed during an online session conducted by High Court deputy registrar Maslinda Selamat today.

“The trial will be before Justice Akhtar Tahir,” Shahir told FMT.

He said the matter will be called for case management on June 7 next year to ensure all pre-trial directions have been complied with by both parties before the hearing begins.

Lalitha was represented by counsel Ibrahim KP Kunji Mohamed.

Shahir, who was assisted by Alya Tadwini Talha, said Azam intends to call two witnesses to give evidence at the trial.

Azam sued Lalitha in January last year over a two-part series she wrote titled “Business ties among MACC leadership: How deep does it go?”

The articles were published on the Independent News Service (INS) portal on Oct 26, 2021 and republished on Dec 15 the same year.

He also claimed Lalitha had shared links to the articles on her Twitter account @LalithaVelvet.Azam said the articles were sensational, scandalous and offensive.

He said they were written and republished maliciously to portray him as a corrupt civil servant who had abused his position as a senior MACC officer for his or his sibling’s interests.

He also claims the alleged defamatory statements suggest that he owns shares and warrants worth millions of ringgit purchased with money obtained illegally.

He said they also suggest he had invested millions of ringgit over a short period of time, and had not declared the purchase of shares and warrants during his tenure as MACC’s director of investigations.

In addition, he claims the articles suggested that he and his brother were directly or indirectly involved in illegal activities through a company known as RI Intelligence Sdn Bhd.

In her defence, Lalitha denied that the articles, taken in their proper context and natural and ordinary meaning, were defamatory of Azam.

In any event, she said, she was entitled to rely on the defence of justification, qualified privilege, neutral reportage, the “Reynolds defence”, fair comment, and several provisions in the Defamation Act 1957.

The “Reynolds defence” was developed by the House of Lords in a landmark case known as Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd (1999).

In that case, England’s apex court held that a journalist reporting responsibly on matters of public concern was entitled to protection from defamation suits even if the report contains allegations which turn out to be wrong. - FMT, 13/3/2023